Predicting Online Islamophopic Behavior after #ParisAttacks

Authors

  • Kareem Darwish Qatar Computing Research Institute
  • Walid Magdy School of Informatics The University of Edinburgh
  • Afshin Rahimi Dept. of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne
  • Timothy Baldwin Dept. of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne
  • Norah Abokhodair The Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1561/106.00000013

Abstract

The Paris terrorist attacks occurred on November 13, 2015, prompting a massive response on social media including Twitter, with millions of posted tweets in the first few hours after the attacks. Most of the tweets were condemning the attacks and showing support to Parisians. One of the trending debates related to the attacks concerned possible association between terrorism and Islam, and Muslims in general. This created a global discussion between those attacking and those defending Islam and Muslims. In this paper, we use this incident to examine the effect of online social network interactions prior to an event to predict what attitudes will be expressed in response to the event. Specifically, we focus on how a person's online content and network dynamics can be used to predict future attitudes and stance in the aftermath of a major event.
In our study, we collected a set of 8.36 million tweets related to the Paris attacks within the 50 hours following the event, of which we identified over 900k tweets mentioning Islam and Muslims. We quantitatively analyzed users' network interactions and historical tweets to predict their attitudes towards Islam and Muslim.
We provide a description of the quantitative results based on the content (hashtags) and network interactions (retweets, replies, and mentions). We analyze two types of data: (1) we use post-event tweets to learn users' stated stance towards Muslims based on sampling methods and crowd-sourced annotations; and (2) we employ pre-event interactions on Twitter to build a classifier to predict post-event stance. We found that pre-event network interactions can predict attitudes towards Muslims with 82\% macro F-measure, even in the absence of prior mentions of Islam, Muslims, or related terms.

References

[Anand et al. 2011] Pranav Anand, Marilyn Walker, Rob Abbott, Jean E Fox Tree, Robeson Bowmani, and Michael Minor. 2011. Cats rule and dogs drool!: Classifying stance in online debate. In The 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis. 1-9.

[Awan 2014] Imran Awan. 2014. Islamophobia and Twitter: A Typology of Online Hate Against Muslims on Social Media. Policy & Internet 6, 2 (2014), 133-150.

[Baldwin et al. ] Timothy Baldwin, Paul Cook, Marco Lui, Andrew MacKinlay, and Li Wang. How Noisy Social Media Text, How Different Social Media Sources?

[Barbera 2015] Pablo Barbera. 2015. Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis 23, 1 (2015), 76-91.

[Barbera et al. 2015] Pablo Barbera, John T Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A Tucker, and Richard Bonneau. 2015. Tweeting from Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication more than an Echo Chamber? Psychological Science (2015).

[BBC 2015] BBC. 2015. Paris attacks: What happened on the night. BBC (Nov. 2015). http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34818994

[Borge-Holthoefer et al. 2015] Javier Borge-Holthoefer, Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, and Ingmar Weber. 2015. Content and network dynamics behind Egyptian political polarization on Twitter. In CSCW 2015. 700-711.

[Burfoot et al.] Clinton Burfoot, Steven Bird, and Timothy Baldwin. Collective Classiffication of Congressional Floor-Debate Transcripts.

[Castillo et al. 2015] Mariano Castillo, Margot Haddad, Michael Martinez, and Steve Almasy. 2015. Paris suicide bomber identiffied; ISIS claims responsibility for 129 dead. CNN (Nov. 2015). http: //edition.cnn.com/2015/11/14/world/paris-attacks/

[Cheng et al. 2010] Zhiyuan Cheng, James Caverlee, and Kyumin Lee. 2010. You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating Twitter users. In CIKM 2010. 759-768.

[Chenoweth and Stephan 2011] Erica Chenoweth and Maria J Stephan. 2011. Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent con ict. Columbia University Press.

[Cialdini and Trost 1998] Robert B Cialdini and Melanie R Trost. 1998. Social in uence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (Eds.). McGraw-Hill.

[Cohen and Ruths 2013] Raviv Cohen and Derek Ruths. 2013. Classifying Political Orientation on Twitter: It's Not Easy!. In ICWSM 2013.

[Colleoni et al. 2014] Elanor Colleoni, Alessandro Rozza, and Adam Arvidsson. 2014. Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication 64, 2 (2014), 317-332.

[Conover et al. 2011] Michael D Conover, Bruno Goncalves, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2011. Predicting the political alignment of twitter users. In The 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). 192-199.

[Dalton 2013] Russell J. Dalton. 2013. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. CQ Press.

[de la Hamaide 2015] Sybille de la Hamaide. 2015. Timeline of Paris attacks according to public prosecutor. Reuters (Nov. 2015). http://www.reuters.com/article/ us-france-shooting-timeline-idUSKCN0T31BS20151114

[DellaPosta et al. 2015] Daniel DellaPosta, Yongren Shi, and Michael Macy. 2015. Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes? Amer. J. Sociology 120, 5 (2015), 1473-1511.

[Dubois and Gaffney 2014] Elizabeth Dubois and Devin Gaffney. 2014. The Multiple Facets of In uence Identifying Political In uentials and Opinion Leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist 58, 10 (2014), 1260-1277.

[Esuli and Sebastiani 2006] Andrea Esuli and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2006. SentiWordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In LREC 2006, Vol. 6. 417-422.

[Faulkner 2014] Adam Faulkner. 2014. Automated classiffication of stance in student essays: An approach using stance target information and the Wikipedia link-based measure. In The 27th International Florida Artifficial Intelligence Research Society Conference. 174-179.

[Garimella and Weber 2014] Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella and Ingmar Weber. 2014. Co-following on Twitter. In The 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. 249-254.

[Golbeck and Hansen 2014] Jennifer Golbeck and Derek Hansen. 2014. A method for computing political preference among Twitter followers. Social Networks 36 (2014), 177-184.

[Groseclose and Milyo 2005] Tim Groseclose and Jeffrey Milyo. 2005. A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (2005), 1191-1237.

[Han et al. 2012] Bo Han, Paul Cook, and Timothy Baldwin. 2012. Geolocation Prediction in Social Media Data by Finding Location Indicative Words. In COLING 2012. 1045-1062.

[Han et al. 2014] Bo Han, Paul Cook, and Timothy Baldwin. 2014. Text-based Twitter User Geolocation Prediction. Journal of Artifficial Intelligence Research 49 (2014), 451-500.

[Hecht et al. 2011] Brent Hecht, Lichan Hong, Bongwon Suh, and Ed H Chi. 2011. Tweets from Justin Bieber's heart: the dynamics of the location ffield in user proffiles. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 237-246.

[Himelboim et al. 2013] Itai Himelboim, Stephen McCreery, and Marc Smith. 2013. Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18, 2 (2013), 40-60.

[Korda and Itani 2013] Holly Korda and Zena Itani. 2013. Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promotion Practice 14, 1 (2013), 15-23.

[Laranjo et al. 2015] Liliana Laranjo, Amael Arguel, Ana L Neves, Aideen M Gallagher, Ruth Kaplan, Nathan Mortimer, Guilherme A Mendes, and Annie YS Lau. 2015. The in uence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 22, 1 (2015), 243-256.

[Magdy et al. 2015] Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, and Norah Abokhodair. 2015. Quantifying Public Response towards Islam on Twitter after Paris Attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.04570 (2015).

[Magdy et al. ] Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, Afshin Rahimi, Norah Abokhodair, and Timothy Baldwin. #ISISisNotIslam or #DeportAllMuslims? Predicting Unspoken Views.

[Magdy et al. 2016] Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, and Ingmar Weber. 2016. #FailedRevolutions: Using Twitter to study the antecedents of ISIS support. First Monday 21, 2 (2016).

[Pang and Lee 2008] Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2, 1-2 (2008), 1-135.

[Pavalanathan and Eisenstein 2015] Umashanthi Pavalanathan and Jacob Eisenstein. 2015. Confounds and Consequences in Geotagged Twitter Data. In EMNLP 2015. 2138-2148.

[Rahimi et al. 2015] Afshin Rahimi, Duy Vu, Trevor Cohn, and Timothy Baldwin. 2015. Exploiting Text and Network Context for Geolocation of Social Media Users. In NAACL-HLT 2015. 1362-1367.

[Rajadesingan and Liu 2014] Ashwin Rajadesingan and Huan Liu. 2014. Identifying Users with Opposing Opinions in Twitter Debates. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. 153-160.

[Runnymede Trust 1997] London (United Kingdom); Runnymede Trust. 1997. Islamophobia A challenge for us all.

[Speriosu et al. 2011] Michael Speriosu, Nikita Sudan, Sid Upadhyay, and Jason Baldridge. 2011. Twitter polarity classiffication with label propagation over lexical links and the follower graph. In The 1st Workshop on Unsupervised Learning in NLP. 53-63.

[Sridhar et al. 2014] Dhanya Sridhar, Lise Getoor, and Marilyn Walker. 2014. Collective stance classiffication of posts in online debate forums. ACL 2014 (2014), 109-117.

[Syeed 2015] Nafeesa Syeed. 2015. Paris Terror Attacks: Yes, Parisians are traumatised, but the spirit of resistance still lingers. Independent.ie (Nov. 2015). http://goo.gl/toaabz

[Thomas et al. 2006] Matt Thomas, Bo Pang, and Lillian Lee. 2006. Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional oor-debate transcripts. In EMNLP 2006. 327-335.

[Turner 1991] John C Turner. 1991. Social In uence. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

[Walker et al. 2012] Marilyn A Walker, Jean E Fox Tree, Pranav Anand, Rob Abbott, and Joseph King. 2012. A Corpus for Research on Deliberation and Debate.. In LREC 2012. 812-817.

[Weber and Garimella 2014] Ingmar Weber and Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella. 2014. Using Co-Following for Personalized Out-of-Context Twitter Friend Recommendation.. In ICWSM 2014.

[Weber et al. 2013] Ingmar Weber, Venkata R Kiran Garimella, and Alaa Batayneh. 2013. Secular vs. islamist polarization in Egypt on Twitter. In The 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. 290-297.

[Wong et al. 2013] Felix Ming Fai Wong, Chee Wei Tan, Soumya Sen, and Mung Chiang. 2013. Quantifying Political Leaning from Tweets and Retweets.. In ICWSM 2013. 640-649.

[Zampieri et al. 2015] Marcos Zampieri, Liling Tan, Nikola Ljubesic, Jorg Tiedemann, and Preslav Nakov. 2015. The Joint Workshop on Language Technology for Closely Related Languages, Varieties and Dialects. In Overview of the DSL Shared Task 2015. 1-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-16

Issue

Vol. 4 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

The copyright of the published articles stays with the authors.